MY CONTRIBUTION
- Sessions
- 34
- Registrations
- 1,412
- Attendees
- 1,019
- Avg. satisfaction
- 2.91 / 3
Program participation and satisfaction measures for the whole series, not measured productivity gains or AI use.
AI ENABLEMENT AND ADOPTION | PROJECT DELIVERY
I help teams understand their workflows, choose practical uses for AI and automation, and support the people using them. My experience connects HR and benefits operations with IT project delivery, Microsoft 365, and user enablement.
View work for
MY CONTRIBUTION
Program participation and satisfaction measures for the whole series, not measured productivity gains or AI use.
Independent projects that show how I would approach a problem. They are separate from the workplace work above and are not production deployments.
This project shows how I would structure AI use-case intake, scoring, review, and reporting. It is a simulation of an enterprise intake process, not a production deployment.
View repositoryThis project outlines a narrow HR policy assistant, including source boundaries, human escalation, test planning, and proposed measures. It shows the controls I would define before a rollout, not a claim of production performance.
View repositoryThis case pack shows how I approach offboarding requirements, process design, risks, and measurement. It is separate from my workplace Power Automate offboarding implementation and does not establish that every step shown was deployed.
View repositoryA documentation-first framework for deciding whether a team is ready to adopt AI, scored across six dimensions with a go, fix-then-go, or no-go recommendation. It has not yet been run against a real team.
View repositoryI use Perplexity and Perplexity Computer extensively for research and project work. These are independent projects I designed and iterated with AI assistance. They are personal and portfolio work, not an employer deployment, and no time-saved or usage figures are claimed.
I configured and iterated a library of Computer skills for research, evidence management, communication, and personal workflow automation. Each skill has defined inputs, a clear owner for each task, a set output format, and a point where it stops and asks me instead of acting.
I set source-of-truth rules, claim restrictions, versioned handoffs, and verification checkpoints for workflows shared between Perplexity and Claude. The goal is simple: each tool knows what it owns, and nothing unverified gets treated as fact.
An interactive simulator I built and iterated with Perplexity Computer. It teaches a complex rule through draggable scenarios, freeze-frame explanations, and plain-language feedback. It shows how I turn a hard concept into something people can try for themselves.
Try Offside LabBuilt with AI assistance: I chose the problems, audiences, requirements, and corrections; Perplexity Computer generated much of the implementation. No learning-effectiveness, adoption, or time-saved results are claimed.
My background spans benefits operations, employee support, and IT project delivery. I bring that operational perspective to AI enablement, workflow improvement, and process documentation.
I have worked with benefits data, vendor processes, employee communications, and cross-functional systems work. That experience helps me connect technology decisions with the people and processes they affect.
Understand the work and responsibilities before choosing a tool.
Use AI where it fits and a straightforward workflow where it does not.
Document the process, testing, user guidance, and responsibilities.
State what was built, what was tested, and what remains a proposal.
I'm interested in roles that connect AI enablement, HR technology, and practical process improvement. I'd welcome the chance to walk through the examples here and explain my contribution.